Abstract
- Each the iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge are anticipated to compromise on battery life in change for thinness.
- That is a step backwards, contemplating that nobody is asking for thinner telephones, but persons are all the time asking for extra runtime.
- It could be that the telephones are a obligatory step in direction of a greater future, however as rumored, they will not be getting my cash.
It looks like
iPhone 17
rumors are hitting continuous today, which is sensible — we’re about 4 months out from launch, so {hardware} particulars must be locked down forward of mass manufacturing. It takes fairly some time to churn out the tens of millions of items Apple must fulfill worldwide launch demand.
The newest rumor (by way of The Information), is that to be able to obtain its ultra-thin 5.5mm physique, the
iPhone 17 Air
will sport a critical compromise in battery life. How a lot? Allegedly, Apple’s inner testing means that simply 60 to 70% of homeowners will be capable of make it a full day on a single cost, down from about 80 to 90% for different iPhone fashions. The corporate is even mentioned to be making ready a brand new battery case, one thing it hasn’t provided for the reason that discontinued MagSafe Battery Pack.
Related rumors have emerged round Samsung’s
Galaxy S25 Edge
. In accordance with WinFuture, the cellphone could have a 3,900mAh battery — that is extra capability than the iPhone 16, however beneath the common S25’s 4,000mAh, and far lower than the S25 Extremely’s 5,000mAh. That is put me off each Samsung and Apple’s upcoming “vanguard” telephones, and never simply because everybody prefers larger numbers.
Associated
Is the iPhone 15 still worth buying in 2025? The answer is complicated
Presumably, however you should not get one straight from Apple.
Dealing with the established order
As a tech journalist, I is perhaps an exception, however I discover that almost all telephones nonetheless do not have sufficient battery life, by no means thoughts rolling issues again. My present every day driver is an iPhone 16 Professional, which in keeping with Apple, ought to be able to as much as 22 hours of (streaming) video playback. Sounds spectacular, proper? In follow, nevertheless, I am struggling to consider how that might be doable. I wish to placed on Reuters’ video briefing whereas I bathe and alter within the morning, and I will generally see the battery drop to 90% or decrease earlier than I even get downstairs for breakfast. On exercise days, it is doable for the battery to dip beneath 30% by the point I get into mattress, and that is after a 15- to 16-hour day of largely non-video exercise. If I truly spent an hour or two streaming YouTube, I might in all probability must put my cellphone in Low Energy Mode in some unspecified time in the future.
This yr, it looks as if each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake.
I might say it is baffling that Apple and Samsung look like headed within the improper path, however actually, it isn’t. Each firms have lengthy put different upgrades forward of battery life. It’s, in idea, doable to make it over a day if you happen to’ve acquired a cellphone just like the Galaxy S25 Extremely or iPhone 16 Professional Max, however solely with mild utilization. Certainly, battery life has all the time performed second fiddle for many smartphone makers, just because larger batteries are costly whereas being powerful to take advantage of in advertising campaigns. A 6.9-inch display screen or a 10X telephoto lens is instantly spectacular — it is tougher to wow folks with an additional two or three hours of runtime.
This yr, it looks as if each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake. It should appeal to some folks, definitely, however we’re not within the 2000s anymore — telephones have been skinny for a very long time. Nobody I do know is complaining about thickness. If something, the difficulty appears to be that telephones have change into unwieldly, getting thinner whereas concurrently rising taller, wider, and slipperier. Steel and glass could also be good aesthetically — however with no case, skinny units like my iPhone and my spouse’s OnePlus 9 5G really feel like they may slip out of my fingers with one improper gesture.

Associated
The OnePlus 13R shows OnePlus still needs to figure out budget phones
So near funds nirvana, but thus far.
A worrisome path for the long run
Misusing the newest tech
Each the iPhone 17 Air and S25 Edge could also be primarily based on silicon-carbon batteries, a variation of the lithium-ion batteries we’re used to, merely with larger power density. That hasn’t been confirmed, however the tech has been utilized in a couple of telephones already, and now appears poised to go mainstream.
If that’s the case, I am frightened {that a} dangerous precedent is rising. After I first heard about silicon-carbon, my hope was that we might get extra longevity out of telephones the identical measurement, or at the very least equal longevity from barely smaller units. Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we might be hit with a wave of copycat units, a few of which can additionally throw battery life below the bus. That will take the business backward at a time when persons are extra depending on smartphones than ever.
To be honest, Apple and Samsung could also be attempting to maintain components prices down and retail costs in test. Silicon-carbon batteries are costlier to supply in the meanwhile, so even attempting to match the capacities of ordinary lithium-ion batteries could also be tough with no chew into revenue margins. It might be that when manufacturing prices come down, we’ll see capacities go up once more, fulfilling the brand new tech’s promise. Who is aware of — possibly Apple will truly ship a two-day iPhone sooner or later.
Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we’ll inevitably be hit with a wave of copycat units, a few of which can additionally throw battery life below the bus.
Alongside these traces, I am hopeful that each the Air and the Edge will serve a goal just like the iPhone X, which Apple launched in 2017. This was the primary iPhone with an OLED show and a
Face ID
digicam, costing a then-unprecedented $999. Many individuals balked at it, however gross sales of the iPhone X, iPhone XS, and iPhone 11 Professional finally pushed manufacturing prices down, making it doable to place each OLED and Face ID on the $799 iPhone 12. Lately, even the $599
iPhone 16e
shares these options.
Time will inform how briskly the brand new battery tech bridges over to helpful capacities at reasonably priced costs, if it does in any respect. I simply know that for now, Apple and Samsung can rely me out of units that cut back battery life with none tangible advantages. It will hardly matter how cool a cellphone appears sliding out of my pocket if I am unable to make it to the fitness center and again with out plugging into my automobile — or from Alberta to Texas with no battery pack or charging through the flight’s layover. I assume I will nonetheless be bringing my iPad alongside for mid-flight leisure.

You may additionally like
Everything you need to know about PEVs, or personal electric vehicles
You need to use PEVs to discover, run errands, or pace up your commute.
Trending Merchandise

CHONCHOW LED Keyboard and Mouse, 104 Keys Rai...

HP Notebook Laptop, 15.6″ HD Touchscree...

Wireless Keyboard and Mouse Combo, MARVO 2.4G...
